On this page

1. Quality assurance

2. Research and evidence supporting Youth Work

3. Participative Youth Work

4. Smart youth work: youth work in the digital world

Quality assurance

There is no quality assurance system that is specific to youth work programmes.

Probably the most elaborate quality assurance of youth work (which overlaps with research) relates to Erasmus+ Youth, the Hungarian implementation of RAY (Research-based Analysis of Erasmus+/YiA) carried out by Rubeus Foundation (Rubeus Egyesület) with the coordination of the Tempus Public Foundation. Besides these, only the reporting requirement for projects funded through grant applications can be mentioned, where organisations must submit detailed reports on implementation and outcomes (see 1.7 Funding youth policy).

Research and evidence supporting Youth Work

There is no specific research on youth work, and as such, youth work policies are not regularly evaluated on the basis of research. In general, it is difficult to obtain data on youth work as the concept is often mixed with volunteering and youth participation. However, the regular large sample of youth research (see 1.6 Evidence-based youth policy) includes questions related to youth services. This enables practitioners and policymakers to estimate the accessibility of and needs for youth services.

Research of GYIÖT

In 2023, GYIÖT conducted a non-representative survey among youth work professionals in which 330 people took part. One conclusion was that both the representation and the daily work of those working in this profession are severely limited by the availability of resources. This applies particularly to financial resources and thus, the lack of infrastructure and human resources. The creation, maintenance and effective operation of professional communities of interest is difficult because of the

• lack of experience,
• shortage of professionals,
• lack of motivation, and
• the resulting workload.

More than half of respondents work for NGOs, suggesting that the engagement of community and state actors can be strengthened. Activities in NGOs and other contexts emphasise on active citizenship education and support young age groups in dealing with difficulties. In contrast, the objectives in municipal and state organisations/institutions focus more on providing meaningful leisure activities for youth. The most important issue in the youth profession is the political and social recognition of youth work.

In addition, the Hungarian Association of Youth Service Providers (ISZOSZ) has conducted research in 2024 on the needs of young people aged 16-22, and their access to youth services. As of March 2025, the results have not yet been published.

Participative Youth Work

As mentioned before, a typical way how youth work is organised is based on organic grassroots initiatives. (Please see 10.2 Administration and governance of youth work for details.) 

Top-level approaches often focus on youth participation (see sub-chapter 5.3 and sub-chapter 5.4). Besides this, the only top-level authority related to youth policy is currently the Board of the Children and Youth Fund (Gyermek és Ifjúsági Alapprogram Tanácsa), and the National Youth Council (Nemzeti Ifjúsági Tanács) is involved in channelling the interests of youth organisations. The Council has two annual plenary meetings and consultations in the capital and the countryside on a project basis where local decision-makers and young people can dialogue on specific issues. Targeted consultation specifically to youth work policies does not exist.

Smart youth work: youth work in the digital world

The webpage 'http://www.unp.hu/' worked as a professional site targeted at youth workers and youth experts. It functioned as a knowledge base, and a networking tool was developed, where a database of youth experts and a resource map of local youth services was published. The website still operates but is not updated regularly anymore in 2023 because of the termination of the role of the Fund.